Start a new SiXiS project

PROJECT-ONBOARDING-V0-1 / PHASE 1 / PASTE-BASED FLOW

Amendment 2fd8b49e…

PROD ADMIN VIEW · READ-ONLY · WRITES STILL ON LOCAL
Amendment 2fd8b49e…
tommy · 2026-05-06 00:23:47
Candidate refinement to the project-onboarding flow (and likely a candidate Universal Shell amendment for any discovery-drill pattern): the Claude discovery drill must be conversational, not a batch dump of questions. One question at a time. Each answer can collapse other queued questions, open deeper follow-ups, or pivot to a different thread entirely. Pre-loading a checklist of 5-6 questions and firing them at you all at once defeats the point — it forces you to context-switch across all of them and prevents the answers from shaping the next question. You said it directly: 'one question could either answer another, or lead to a deeper or alternative questions.' This refines what the council converged on in Round 1 — they said 'fixed checklist + adaptive depth keyed to tier,' but neither named the conversational-cadence requirement. The checklist is internal scaffolding for me, not an interrogation script for you. Queued for Layer B drafting on this project and as a candidate amendment to the Universal Shell discovery-drill section.
Awaiting council: 2 more ratify position(s) needed (have 0/2)
Council positions (0)
≥2 distinct brains with position='ratify' (and zero 'refuse') unlocks the inline Ratify button.
No council positions logged yet.
Ratification chain (0)
Events that reference this amendment_proposed via caused_by_event_id.
(none yet)